This site may earn chapter commissions from the links on this page. Terms of utilize.

Itanic

Intel has announced that it volition discontinue the Itanium series of CPUs in 2021. The Itanium 9700 family, codenamed Kittson, is the last generation of Itanium to send, with quad-core and eight-core models at clocks ranging from one.73GHz to 2.66GHz and a TDP of 170W.

Kittson was originally supposed to be a major architectural overhaul for Itanium, introducing new features and capabilities, only after the infamous HP versus Oracle lawsuit, Intel basically threw in the towel and dropped an update that included clock speed tweaks and little else.

Intel-Merced


Intel'south Merced, the first-generation Itanium processor.

Intel customers must order their final Itanium CPUs and associated scalable memory buffers past January thirty, 2020. Intel will and then ship the CPUs until July 29, 2021. HPE has promised to continue hardware in-stock through December 31, 2025, only will presumably terminate selling servers sooner than that to avoid running out of inventory.

What a Long Strange Trip Information technology's Been

Once upon a time, Itanium was the futurity. The chip was designed to solve the performance bottlenecks that Intel believed would handicap x86 and foreclose it from scaling in the future. Intel threw so much weight behind it, companies like HP flat-out canceled their competing RISC designs, while Compaq chucked Alpha.

Itanium Sales forecast.

The bluish and green lines are the forecasted sales. The orangish line is the reality.

Intel's programme was to employ the transition from 32-bit to 64-bit architectures to simultaneously make a radical modify to its underlying CPU engineering. Before Itanium launched, this made a certain amount of theoretical sense. The 32-bit/64-bit shift was a major inflection betoken for the manufacture, and probably the best possible time to introduce a CPUSEEAMAZON_ET_135 See Amazon ET commerce with a radically new architecture.

Unfortunately, Itanium wasn't capable of doing the job its creators envisioned. The original idea behind its EPIC (Explicitly Parallel Instruction Computing) was to push the complexity of instruction scheduler from the CPU to the compiler. At the time, performing out-of-order execution on the CPU consumed pregnant amounts of power and it wasn't clear how well the adequacy would calibration. Itanium took an altogether different approach to improve computing functioning past essentially dedicating the entire chip to enshroud and execution units, with all of the difficulty of scheduling workloads offloaded to the compiler.

The problem with offloading parallelization to the compiler at runtime is that the filibuster incurred when loading information from CPU caches or DRAM isn't deterministic, which means it tin can't be anticipated in advance. Not being able to make up one's mind when retentivity accesses would occur means the compiler's load pedagogy schedule volition inevitably leave the CPU stalled for long periods of fourth dimension. Put merely, Itanium failed in role because Intel pushed a job into software that software compilers aren't capable of addressing all that effectively. More than details on this issue are available here.

Because Itanium was such a radical difference from anything else on the market, it ran ported software very poorly unless said software was manus-optimized for IA-64 (the Itanium 64-bit architecture) from the ground upwards. Squeezing acceptable performance from the silicon was a challenging effort that ultimately express the CPU to a few niche markets.

I genuinely don't know if Intel could've transformed Itanium into a suitable consumer desktop product if they'd had no 64-bit contest. The challenges Itanium faced were formidable and information technology consumed a great deal of ability. It's quite difficult to imagine a laptop running an IA-64 CPU that looked anything similar the chips Intel actually manufactured. One reason we never found out is that AMD's Opteron introduced x86-64, with full backward compatibility with IA-32 software. Intel held off announcing any kind of x86 64-fleck project themselves for several years, but somewhen caved and acknowledged they would as well build a 64-bit CPU effectually the x86 architecture. Once they did, Itanium's trajectory was set.

I'll cop to a bit of affection for Itanium, odd as it was. Similar Sony'southward Cell Broadband Engine, it's an example of a radically different CPU architecture that didn't manage to achieve its own goals, but still represents a smashing deal of work by some incredibly intelligent people. Sometimes the chips that don't work out as intended are the most interesting ones to read almost.

Now Read:

Itanium'south Last Hurrah: Intel Releases the 9700 Series
Shadows of Itanium: Russian business firm debuts VLIW Elbrus 4 CPU with onboard x86 emulation
The Worst CPUs Ever Fabricated